Programme Outcomes (PO)

• PO-1 : To think critically and analyze chemical problems
• PO-2 : To understand the present scientific and technical information resulting from laboratory experimentation in both written and oral formats.
• PO-3 : To work effectively and safely in a laboratory environment
• PO-4 : To use technologies and instrumentation together to explore new areas of research
• PO-5 : To work as a member of interdisciplinary problem solving team and apply their scientific skill to innovative studies.

Programme Specific Outcomes (PSO)

• PSO-1 : Understand the fundamental concepts in Organic, Inorganic, physical and Analytical Chemistry
• PSO-2 : Develop the analytical ability to perform scientific experiments skillfully by application of procedural knowledge.
• PSO-3 : Idea about research in chemistry and knowledge of the significance of the scientific concepts learnt which find application in industry, medicine and modern research.
• PSO-4 : Improve a capacity of working in research labs and related fields.

Download

Facilities

Laboratory facilities:
Chemistry laboratory is spaciously built in the third floor of Science block. It is equipped with modern digital equipments pertaining to the curriculum and syllabi of Anna University Coimbatore. Special attention is given to individual students by providing the required numbers of apparatus to learn the chemistry with excellence.

Trained laboratory personnel must understand how chemical laboratory facilities operate. Given the chance, they should provide input to the laboratory designers to ensure that the facilities meet the needs of the functions of the laboratory. Laboratory personnel need to understand the capabilities and limitations of the ventilation systems, environmental controls, laboratory chemical hoods, and other exhaust devices associated with such equipment and how to use them properly. To ensure safety and efficiency, the experimental work should be viewed in the context of the entire laboratory and its facilities.
Considerations for Open Laboratory Design
There are advantages and disadvantages to open laboratory design.
Advantages include

• visibility among researchers;
• better communication and collaboration;
• easy to share resources, including equipment, space, and support staff;
• flexibility for future needs because of open floor plan with adaptable furnishings;
• significant space savings compared with smaller, enclosed laboratories; and
• cost savings (first building/renovation costs and ongoing operating costs) compared with smaller, enclosed laboratories.

Laboratory Layout and Furnishing

Adaptability

The frequency of change in laboratory use has made it desirable to provide furnishings and services that can be moved and adapted quickly. Although some services and surfaces will be fixed elements in any laboratory, such as sinks and chemical hoods, there are several options available to meet the adaptable needs for various types of research.
Current design practice is to locate fixed elements such as laboratory chemical hoods and sinks at the perimeter of the laboratory, ensuring maximum mobility of interior equipment and furniture. Although fixed casework is common at the perimeters, moveable pieces are at the center to maximize flexibility. The central parts of the laboratory are configured with sturdy mobile carts, adjustable tables, and equipment racks.
Another trend for new laboratory buildings is to design interstitial spaces between the floors and to have all the utilities above the ceiling. The interstitial spaces are large enough to allow maintenance workers to access these utilities from above the ceiling for both routine servicing and to move plumbing and other utilities as research demands change.
Where interstitial spaces are not possible, overhead service carriers may be hung from the underside of the structural floor system. These service carriers may have quick connects to various utilities, such as local exhaust ventilation, computer cables, light fixtures, and electrical outlets.

Casework, Furnishings, and Fixtures

Casework should be durable and designed and constructed in a way that provides for long-term use, reuse, and relocation. Some materials may not hold up well to intensive chemistry or laboratory reconfiguration. Materials should be easy to clean and repair. For clean rooms, polypropylene or stainless steel may be preferable.
Work surfaces should be chemical resistant, smooth, and easy to clean. Benchwork areas should have knee space to allow for chairs near fixed instruments or for procedures requiring prolonged operation.
Work areas, including computers, should incorporate ergonomic features, such as adjustability, task lighting, and convenient equipment layout. Allow adequate space for ventilation and cooling of computers and other electronics.
Hand washing sinks for particularly hazardous materials may require elbow, foot, or electronic controls. Do not install more cup sinks than are needed. Unused sinks may develop dry traps that result in odor complaints.

S.NO	EQUIPMENTS	DESCRIPTION
1	Weighing Balance	To weigh the mass of the sample
2	Centrifuge Instrument	To separate substances of lesser density from greater density
3	Water Bath	To incubate samples in water at a constant temperature over a long period of time
4	Printer	To digitizes printed documents and images
5	Magnetic Stirrer	A rotating magnetic field to cause a stir bar immersed in a liquid to spin very quickly, thus stirring it

Syllabus

SYLLABUS - ACADEMIC   YEAR  2021 ONWARDS    : VIEW DOCUMENT

SYLLABUS - ACADEMIC   YEAR  2023  ONWARDS :  VIEW DOCUMENT

Faculty

S.No	Name	Qualification	Designation

Activities

S.No	Date	Activity Name	Resource Person	Beneficiary
1	19.08.16	GL- STEREO CHEMISTRY	Dr.A.LALITHA, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, PERIYAR UNIVERSITY	I & II PG
2	31.08.2017	Guest Lecture “Spectroscopy”	Dr. K.SARAVANAN	III UG
3	29.08.2017	Guest Lecture on “TERM SYMBOLS”	Dr. A. Akilandeswari	I & II PG
4	26.02.18	Guest Lecture on “SPECTROSCOPY”	Dr. G. PRAKASH	I & II PG
5	25.01.19	GL PROGRAMME PERICYCLIC REACTIONS		I & II PG
6	22.02.19	GL PROGRAM ON ORGANO METALLIC CHEMISTRY		II UG & II PG
7	23.12.19	GL		III UG & I PG
8	20.01.20	GL	Dr.S.Ramesh M.Sc, Mphil, Sri vasavi college, Erode	I & II PG
9	29.09.21	GL on Quantum chemistry		II PG

Projects

Alumnae

S.NO	NAME	BATCH	POSITION	PHOTOS
1	DEIVAMANI.P	2015	QUALITY ANALYSIS - INFOSYS
2	HEMANIVETHA.K	2015	PROJECT HEAD - 1ST AMERICAN
3	INDHUMATHI.K	2016	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -TECH MAHANDHARA
4	JOTHI.K	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST AND HEAD -TCS
5	KARISHMA.K	2013	QUALITY ANALYST - SUTHARLAND
6	D.MALIKA	2014	QUALITY ANALYSIS - INFOSYS
7	V.KAMALI	2014	PROJECT HEAD - 1ST AMERICAN
8	R.KOWSALYA	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -EMPOSYS
9	S.PAVITHRA	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST AND HEAD -24/7
10	B.PRIYA	2013	QUALITY ANALYST - JUSTDILIE
11	A.MENAKA	2013	QUALITY ANALYSIS - ALL SEC
12	S.PAVITHARA	2013	PROJECT HEAD - JOB FAIR
13	POORNIMA.D	2014	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -VRCM
14	S.RENUGA	2013	QUALITY ANALYST -PAYTM
15	R.SOWMIYA	2014	QUALITY ANALYST - GARNIA
16	TAMILSELVI.S	2014	QUALITY ANALYSIS - INFOSYS
17	SINDHU.S	2014	PROJECT HEAD - 1ST AMERICAN
18	SANGAVI.M	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -EMPOSYS
19	DIVYASRI.V	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST AND HEAD -24/7
19	AGILA.M	2013	QUALITY ANALYST - JUSTDILIE
20	NAVYASHALINI.K	2014	QUALITY ANALYSIS - HGS
21	RAGAVI.R	2014	PROJECT HEAD - INFOTECH
22	N.SHEELA	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -TECH MAHANDHARA
23	M.SOWNDHARYA	2013	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST AND HEAD -TCS
24	SELVANANTHINI.R	2013	QUALITY ANALYST - SUTHARLAND
25	DHIVYA	2013	QUALITY ANALYSIS - INFOSYS
26	NANDHINI SRI.R	2014	PROJECT HEAD - TCS
27	MAHALAKSHMI.M	2015	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST -TCS
28	AKSHYA.A	2014	SENIOR QUALITY ANALYST AND HEAD -TCS
29	SOWMIYA.C	2015	QUALITY ANALYST - DICOME

Rank Holders

S.No	YEAR	STUDENT NAME	CGPA	RANK
1	2013-2016	N.INDUJA	9.228	VII
2	2018-2021	A.SHANMUGAPRIYA	9.335	IV
3	2018-2021	M.B.THASNEEM BANU	9.286	VI
4	2018-2021	S.ASWINI	9.201	IX

Gallery

Contact